NYPD nabs "Terrorists"
Must be a powerful explosive if they had 7 grams!
Monday, December 31, 2012
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Friday, December 28, 2012
It does not defiey explanation
There are evil people
This guy pour flammable liquid on a woman, the kid in Newtown used firearms
The only difference is body count, there are sick and twisted people every where
This guy pour flammable liquid on a woman, the kid in Newtown used firearms
The only difference is body count, there are sick and twisted people every where
Thursday, December 27, 2012
AWB Agenda
|
Summary of 2013 legislation
Following is a summary of the 2013
legislation:
·
Bans the sale,
transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
·
120 specifically-named
firearms
·
Certain other
semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine
and have one military characteristic
·
Semiautomatic rifles
and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds
·
Strengthens the
1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
·
Moving from a
2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
·
Eliminating the
easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics
test
·
Banning firearms with
“thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around”
prior bans
·
Bans large-capacity
ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
·
Protects legitimate
hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
·
Grandfathering weapons
legally possessed on the date of enactment
·
Exempting over 900
specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
·
Exempting antique,
manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons
·
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the
National Firearms Act, to include:
·
Background check of owner and any transferee;
·
Type and serial number of the firearm;
·
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
·
Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that
possession would not violate State or local law; and
·
Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration
A pdf of the bill summary is available here.
Registration
If the section in bold above doesn't make
sense, here's what it means to you in practical terms. If you own a weapon that
is covered under the ban (like an AR-15), you will berequired to register
this weapon with the ATF under the National
Firearms Act (NFA). A weapon that you already legally own.
·
You must pay the NFA
tax, which is currently $200.
·
You must be
"certified" by local law enforcement, which currently means the chief
law enforcement officer where you live.
·
You must be
photographed and fingerprinted and then entered into whatever database they
will use for this registration.
·
Then, and only then,
will your currently legal weapon be legal under the new regime.
Agenda Confirmed
The debate on what a renewed Assault Weapons
Ban would or would not do should be just about over. Their agenda is clear - to
eventually disarm America. If you think not, then perhaps you need to brush up
on history, and you really don't even have to go back very far. Take a look at
what happened in England and Australia. First they registered their guns,
telling the government exactly who has what and how many, and then the
government took away their guns type by type. Tell me, what kinds of guns can
you currently own in England and Australia?
NFA registration is an expected move from
Feinstein given their goal to disarm America. From their perspective, NFA
registration makes sense and would be extremely effective both in the short and
long term. What it would accomplish is twofold:
1.
Make it extremely hard
to be "legal" under the new regime. This will mean that most folks
will just give up and participate in the gun buy back program.
2.
The remaining folks
will all be on a list, telling them exactly who to keep an eye on, and where to
go to get the guns when the time comes.
Racism? No.
Classism maybe
We have become a very permissive society, there is seldom structure and or discipline, and for the most part a large segment of the population are whiny children, that do what they want to do, when they want to do it, and when they do something wrong, it is an object's fault, or they lay the blame on someone else. People do not want to be responsible for their own actions, due to not being taught structure and discipline, and responsibility.
The old saying spare the rod, spoil the child. Now my father never used the rod, but it was simple the promise of the rod, kept me in line as a youth. I'm not advocating beating children, but they need discipline and guidance in growing up, to know the limits, and to learn respect and common courtesy.
We have become a very permissive society, there is seldom structure and or discipline, and for the most part a large segment of the population are whiny children, that do what they want to do, when they want to do it, and when they do something wrong, it is an object's fault, or they lay the blame on someone else. People do not want to be responsible for their own actions, due to not being taught structure and discipline, and responsibility.
The old saying spare the rod, spoil the child. Now my father never used the rod, but it was simple the promise of the rod, kept me in line as a youth. I'm not advocating beating children, but they need discipline and guidance in growing up, to know the limits, and to learn respect and common courtesy.
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Oh yeah, that will save lifes
Anti toy gun group
So these are bad?
But this is Just a game
and this is just a movie
Now before you go off, I have nothing against video games, and action or horror movies, but some of them are not suitable for young children. You say they have no influence, on young minds? Yeah right, that is why growing up I wanted to be like John Wayne, & Randolph Scott (if you do not know who John Wayne or Randolph Scott was do some research) Is it OK for young children to watch XXX movies?, Why "No" you say? hmm but it is OK to be the first person shooter in a game, and watch heads explode to get points, and it is ok for them to watch people being butchered on the big screen, but God forbid they play with a toy gun.
So these are bad?
But this is Just a game
and this is just a movie
Now before you go off, I have nothing against video games, and action or horror movies, but some of them are not suitable for young children. You say they have no influence, on young minds? Yeah right, that is why growing up I wanted to be like John Wayne, & Randolph Scott (if you do not know who John Wayne or Randolph Scott was do some research) Is it OK for young children to watch XXX movies?, Why "No" you say? hmm but it is OK to be the first person shooter in a game, and watch heads explode to get points, and it is ok for them to watch people being butchered on the big screen, but God forbid they play with a toy gun.
Tuesday, December 25, 2012
So NY State has all these great gun laws
So how does a convicted felon acquire 3 guns?
New York is one of the Gun Control dream states and ranks 4th with the Brady Center, but despite all those laws a murderer still gets guns
New York is one of the Gun Control dream states and ranks 4th with the Brady Center, but despite all those laws a murderer still gets guns
Maybe I'm not fully awake
But Israel protects students from terrorists, not crazy people with guns?
Yes they do have more restrictive gun laws there, but neither is it hard to get a permit to have and carry a gun
Yes they do have more restrictive gun laws there, but neither is it hard to get a permit to have and carry a gun
MERRY CHRISTMAS
To all, and may you all find peace, or unwrapped the means to maintain peace in the coming year!!
Monday, December 24, 2012
Sunday, December 23, 2012
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Friday, December 21, 2012
Thursday, December 20, 2012
If we save one life
Also attending the meeting were Attorney General Eric Holder, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Obama’s drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske. Senior Obama advisers Bruce Reed, Valerie Jarrett, Cecilia Munoz and Kathy Ruemmler were also in attendance.
I'd say if it were a boat it would capsize
Of course this is the same group that created free fire zones, and deny victims the chance at self defense.
I'd say if it were a boat it would capsize
Of course this is the same group that created free fire zones, and deny victims the chance at self defense.
Marine
Stands as a sentry at school
Is it any wonder why God loves the United States Marine Corp.?
Of course if you scroll into comments you will see the liberals have a problem with it.
Is it any wonder why God loves the United States Marine Corp.?
Of course if you scroll into comments you will see the liberals have a problem with it.
Best done with modern weapons
"By calling attention to 'a well regulated militia', the 'security' of the nation, and the right of each citizen 'to keep and bear arms', our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason, I believe the Second Amendment will always be important."
-- Senator John F. Kennedy, 1960
-- Senator John F. Kennedy, 1960
Time to get busy
A call to the grassroots!
Buy stamps, write letters send emails.........what are you doing still reading this! Get busy protecting your rights!
Buy stamps, write letters send emails.........what are you doing still reading this! Get busy protecting your rights!
So if the next killer uses Molotov Cocktail
Will we ban "Assault Bottles, and Assault Gas"?
In 1990 When this happened I wrote Senator John Glenn, and ask if we should pass some type of ban on gas containers, and require those with gas cans to register them, and further require those purchasing gas in cans to submit to a background check. His reply was there was no amount legislation, that would stop the acts of as madman But being a liberal legislator thought he could control the acts of madmen by controlling and banning certain types of weapons. When the end result is the same, what matter the means?
When the killer enter the theater in Aurora one of 5 showing Batman, but the only one with a "No Guns" sign, instead of hurling smoke canisters, had throw Molotov cocktails the results might have been much worse. We would have shaken our heads and perhaps questioned our mental health laws, but no one would be discussing banning certain fuels or containers.
Other than the Gifford's shooting, most of the mass killers go to "No Guns" helpless victim zones because they don't want to fight, they want to kill. They want everyone else to feel their pain, and they do it by killing. I'm not going to say arm all the teachers, but I am saying give those that are willing to have an effective means to stop the killers, and yes in most cases that would be a firearm.
But instead of grasping the simple solution, the legislators want to pass laws that will effect millions of Americans, that would never hurt a child, or another person for that matter, in the vain hope of stopping a mad man.
The problem is not the guns, or types of guns, it is we have crazy people in the world, in China they have mass knife attacks, on the same day as Sandy Hook, 23 stabbed and cut. Others have left multiple dead and wounded. Because no one had an effective means to stop them.
Children do not need to be told there are monsters in the world, they know there are monsters, children need to know you will protect them from the monsters.
In 1990 When this happened I wrote Senator John Glenn, and ask if we should pass some type of ban on gas containers, and require those with gas cans to register them, and further require those purchasing gas in cans to submit to a background check. His reply was there was no amount legislation, that would stop the acts of as madman But being a liberal legislator thought he could control the acts of madmen by controlling and banning certain types of weapons. When the end result is the same, what matter the means?
When the killer enter the theater in Aurora one of 5 showing Batman, but the only one with a "No Guns" sign, instead of hurling smoke canisters, had throw Molotov cocktails the results might have been much worse. We would have shaken our heads and perhaps questioned our mental health laws, but no one would be discussing banning certain fuels or containers.
Other than the Gifford's shooting, most of the mass killers go to "No Guns" helpless victim zones because they don't want to fight, they want to kill. They want everyone else to feel their pain, and they do it by killing. I'm not going to say arm all the teachers, but I am saying give those that are willing to have an effective means to stop the killers, and yes in most cases that would be a firearm.
But instead of grasping the simple solution, the legislators want to pass laws that will effect millions of Americans, that would never hurt a child, or another person for that matter, in the vain hope of stopping a mad man.
The problem is not the guns, or types of guns, it is we have crazy people in the world, in China they have mass knife attacks, on the same day as Sandy Hook, 23 stabbed and cut. Others have left multiple dead and wounded. Because no one had an effective means to stop them.
Children do not need to be told there are monsters in the world, they know there are monsters, children need to know you will protect them from the monsters.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
OK back in business
Cheaper Than Dirt! will Resume Online Firearm Sales Pending Policy Changes
Cheaper Than Dirt! recently announced that it was temporarily suspending online sales of firearms pending a review of its order processing and procedures. Well-known for its ability to process and ship orders within 24 hours, online sales have skyrocketed to a point where it may take up to 72 hours for firearms and other items to ship.
"In light of recent events, we believe it is prudent to review our policies and procedures to ensure we can continue to provide the products and firearms our customers demand," said Chief Operations Officer Roberta Wilson. "We will resume online sales once we update our process and continue as we have always done by shipping firearms only to FFL dealers."
Ms. Wilson closed with, "As a long-time supporter of the Second Amendment, we will continue to serve the needs of the firearms community while ensuring our unsurpassed level of quality and customer service."
Cheaper Than Dirt! recently announced that it was temporarily suspending online sales of firearms pending a review of its order processing and procedures. Well-known for its ability to process and ship orders within 24 hours, online sales have skyrocketed to a point where it may take up to 72 hours for firearms and other items to ship.
"In light of recent events, we believe it is prudent to review our policies and procedures to ensure we can continue to provide the products and firearms our customers demand," said Chief Operations Officer Roberta Wilson. "We will resume online sales once we update our process and continue as we have always done by shipping firearms only to FFL dealers."
Ms. Wilson closed with, "As a long-time supporter of the Second Amendment, we will continue to serve the needs of the firearms community while ensuring our unsurpassed level of quality and customer service."
Some truth
But registration will not fly
Once started it will end up encompassing all guns, and historically registration leads to confiscation. The guns used at Sandy Hook were registered, and it prevented nothing.
Once started it will end up encompassing all guns, and historically registration leads to confiscation. The guns used at Sandy Hook were registered, and it prevented nothing.
Word has it
That the NRA is signing up 8000 new members a day
You are not trying hard enough, lets go for 10,000 a day!
You are not trying hard enough, lets go for 10,000 a day!
Hmm sounds like make belief
Hidden under floor in attic for 40 years, then he smashes it with a sledgehammer
A lot of I'm a gun owner, but.........stories coming
A lot of I'm a gun owner, but.........stories coming
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Stop Teaching Our Kids To Kill
Dave Grossman, Lt. Col.
USA (ret.)
Author of On
Killing, On Combat, Warrior Mindset, and Stop Teaching Our
Kids to Kill
So, the brutal,
merciless, savage mass murderer of children in CT was another in a long line of
avid video game players who turned their sick fantasy into our tragic reality.
Surprised?
I train military and law
enforcement nation-wide, on the road almost 300 days a year for 15 years.
I was an Army Ranger and a West Point Psych Professor. An author of
many very successful books on this subject. This is the perspective that
I come from...
Bottom line: From
a military and law enforcement perspective, violent video games are
"murder simulators" that train kids to kill. They act just like
police and military simulators, providing conditioned responses, killing
skills, and desensitization, except they are inflicted on children without the
discipline of military and police training.
Research on the
background of our juvenile mass murderers show they have one thing in common:
they ALL dropped out of life and filled their lives with nothing but
violent movies and violent video games. The sickest video games and the
sickest movies are very very sick indeed. And the sick sick kids who
immerse themselves in this "entertainment" are very sick indeed.
Jonesboro in the middle
school, Columbine in the high school, Virginia Tech in the college, and now this
generation gives us Sandy Hook as adults…
The Sandy Hook massacre
has been building for years. And there is much, much worse yet to come.
(They are NOT "shootings" they are massacres ... five died in the
"Boston Massacre" which touched off the American Revolution … six
murdered in the "St. Valentines Day Massacre" … many times more were
murdered in Sandy Hook and we hide the reality from ourselves by calling it a
"shooting" … "shooting" is what happens on the range … a
"shooter" is the guy who got lucky during deer season! These
are brutal mass murderers, committing savage massacres unlike anything seen in
human history.)
This has all been
building up for years. Consider the stats on officers murdered in the
line of duty in the US:
'08: 42
'09: 48
'10: 56
'11: 72
Anyone see a pattern
here? Medical technology is holding DOWN the murder rate. The
number of murdered cops should be going down every year.
These are criminals who
practiced killing cops since they were six years old, every day of their lives,
playing Grand Theft Auto, and now they are primed to kill cops as adults.
If we intentionally
tried to raise a generation cocked and primed to kill, we could not have done a
better job.
The answer?
Parents MUST enforce the rating system. They MUST understand the
danger. An "M" (mature, 17 and above ONLY) rated game is the
same as an "X" rated movie! The people who manufacture the game
say so. Their own industry says so! A "T" (teen) rating
means no child under 13 should play the game. Period. It is a very
tragic, horrendous situation when adults let their children immerse themselves
in M rated games! Just like, sex, gambling, porn, alch, tobacco, drugs,
guns, and automobiles: these are all things that adults must not give to
kids!
Not all of the kids who
play these sick games will become killers, but they will all be desensitized to
human death and suffering, intentionally and realistically inflicted by
themselves, for their own entertainment…
If YOUR child is one who
commits a brutal crime, and YOU let them play these sick games, then the blood
is on your hands too… (And YOU may well be the first one to die, as with
this most recent incident.)
This is NOT business as
usual in America. Never lose your sense of outrage that every kid in
America has to do lock-down drills, practicing "hunkering down and
hiding" for when kids come to kill them. Never lose your sense of
outrage that all of our cops practice going in our schools and shooting our
kids with "active shooter response plans." These things are
necessary, they work, they save lives and hold down the body count, but they
are not normal. This is NOT just another day in America. This is
NOT "business as usual" in America… Something is very, very
wrong.
And it is a world-wide
phenomenon! Germany has had two mass murders in their high schools with
body counts that beat Columbine. England had a massacre in the kindergarten class in Dunblain Scotland, tragically forecasting Sandy Hook.
Canada had the Taber, Alberta school massacre. Finland has had
three school massacres. In Norway the killer got on an island and killed
all their kids. In China killers are going in the classrooms with knives
and gutting and hacking the kids. In Belgium a sicko got in the day care
center and hacked 12 babies in the cribs, dressed as the Joker form the Batman
movie. (All those European gun laws made THEM real safe, eh?)
And we though it
wouldn't happen here!?
And you think its over now? The worst is yet to come.
We will reap what we sow for a generation to come…. Until we stop
teaching our kids to kill.
If you own a gun
You should be a dues paying member of the NRA
Go join now! If you are a member, go now and upgrade your membership level
Go join now! If you are a member, go now and upgrade your membership level
I truly believe this would work
and end school shootings, the killers are not looking for a fight
They do not fear punishment or death, they fear failure
They do not fear punishment or death, they fear failure
So expect a 42% increase in violent crime
If congress bans guns
So if we use the BJS NCVS we would have about eight and quarter million victims of violent crime
So if we use the BJS NCVS we would have about eight and quarter million victims of violent crime
Monday, December 17, 2012
First Hit
Discovery Channel cancels American Guns
Steven Spielberg, said the Sandy Hook shootings were the “act of a monstrously deranged person and cannot conveniently be assigned to violence in entertainment.”
Funny we say guns don't kill, people kill, now it's the movies don't kill, people who watch movies kill.
Steven Spielberg, said the Sandy Hook shootings were the “act of a monstrously deranged person and cannot conveniently be assigned to violence in entertainment.”
Funny we say guns don't kill, people kill, now it's the movies don't kill, people who watch movies kill.
It is not just crazy people
There are also terrorists threat
- The intended attackers have bluntly warned us they're going to do it.
- They're already begun testing school-related targets here.They've given us a catastrophic model to train against, which we've largely ignored and they've learned more deadly tactics from.
They kill their own kids why wouldn't they kill ours? All the signs, and laws and regulations are not going to stop them. The only thing they fear is failure, they do not fear imprisonment or death only failure. We have to detect and deter them 100% of the time, they only need to get it right once.
Weather we like it or not, the world has changed, we have trained 2 generations of people to give bad guys what they want, and we have taught 2 generations of children to embrace violence without discipline. We must accept the fact that there are people who hate us, just because of who we are, and will go to any length to destroy us.
We have to stop playing pretend, and get our heads out of the sand, stand up and realize that these threats are real, and can happen in any city, town, or village, at any time. While we can hope and pray they don't, we should prepare in-case they do. The fastest response time is by those at the scene, I'm not saying arm all of the teachers, but allow those willing to be trained, and armed to do so. Allow those licensed parents to carry on school property.
It is not about the guns, people have had access to guns for well over a hundred years, including repeating arms, but the chaos has been going on for less than 20 of those years. Our society has changed, and we either need to step up and do what is necessary, or be destroyed
In the 1700's authorities required that all men be armed, due to the threat of Indian attack, well the Indians are no longer the threat, but gangs, terrorists, and those sick mentally ill are. We do not need to have everyone armed, but allow those that are willing and trained to do so. Since their biggest fear is failure the short term answer is to meet force with force.
Laws signs and bans will not be a solution, because those with a cause, will find a way, and are not intimidated by either laws or signs, how many laws did the Sandy Hook killer break? Passing more would prevent it? Did a locked door with a sign stop him? Did an adult telling him stop, stop him? The only thing that stopped him was a bullet, in this case his own after the carnage. From all reports the teachers tried to protect those lambs, but without teeth they died with their flock. I would have much rather heard that he died from a bullet that one of the teachers fired, and ended his rampage. Had our laws allowed, and even if one had been armed they would have at least had a change.
The laws we have put in place to protect our children were as much an instrument in the killing as the guns the killer brought with him.
We have been hit, now we can either play Chicken Little and run hither and yon and cry the sky is falling, or we can do what Americans have always done, and pull ourselves up by our boot straps, and protect all those soft targets with citizens willing to step into the breach.
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Levels of Protection III
These girls have
Armed Secret Service Protection
Are everyone else's Children less important? If there is a threat, all children deserve armed protection.
Armed Secret Service Protection
Are everyone else's Children less important? If there is a threat, all children deserve armed protection.
Message from Tom Givens
In the wake of the tragic, horrific slaughter of innocent school children in Connecticut, there has been a renewed cry for more gun control laws. This stems from the natural need to “do something” when a tragedy of this proportion occurs. I agree we need to do something, but the “something” I want is a bit different.
The “Gun Free Schools Act of 1994” made it a federal crime to possess a firearm on any school property. Many states enacted similar legislation at the state level, as the federal act required them to do so or lose certain federal funding. Thus, it has been a crime to go onto school property anywhere in the US while in possession of a gun for the past 28 years. Has that helped?
Well, I did some research and I cannot find a single mass school shooting in the US prior to 1994, when this bill was passed. For the purposes of this discussion, I will define a “mass school shooting” as one in which three or more people were killed. I have found 14 such incidents in the United States between 1997 and the Newtown, CT, incident of yesterday. That is an average of one incident every two years. ALL OF THESE OCCURRED AFTER THE ENACTMENT OF THE GUN FREE SCHOOLS ACT OF 1994! Let me emphasize that—every mass school shooting in the US occurred AFTER it became illegal to possess a gun on school grounds. Why?
The answer should be obvious. By making schools a “gun free zone”, you automatically disarm all law abiding citizens at those locations. This is tantamount to placing a sign on the front of the building inviting criminals and mentally deranged persons to come shoot up the place. “Come on in. We’re all unarmed, by law. We won’t interfere with your mayhem.” Disgusting…..
I, for instance, have a state issued handgun carry permit. I am certified by the NRA as a Law Enforcement Firearms Instructor and I have been certified by the FBI as a police firearms instructor. I am certified by two states to train and certify new firearms instructors for those states. I have held a law enforcement officer commission. I travel all over the US teaching defensive firearms use. Yet, by law, I would commit a felony by stepping onto school grounds while wearing my sidearm. Despite this, someone who, for whatever reason, wants to shoot up a school can walk right in. If he is willing to murder six year olds in cold blood, he certainly won’t be deterred by a law against bringing a gun onto the campus. Duh….. To think otherwise is so naïve as to be a form of mental illness.
I think it is truly ironic that in the first mass school shooting I could find, occurring in 1997, the mayhem was stopped when the Assistant Principal got a handgun from his car and confronted the gunman, who surrendered to him. Thank God the Assistant Principal had an ILLEGAL gun that day.
A couple of weeks ago, there was an attempted mass shooting at a mall in Oregon. The demented shooter had a high capacity semiautomatic rifle, but he only managed to kill two people and wound one other before killing himself. Why was the body count so low, given that this was obviously a copy-cat version of the Aurora, CO, shootings? The answer is simple. Because Nick Meli, age 22, was at the mall there with his wife and child. Nick has a concealed carry permit and was wearing a handgun concealed on his person. When the suspect began shooting, Nick drew his gun and verbally challenged the gunman. Meli held his fire because of innocent people in the background (excellent judgment under stress), but his actions caused the gunman to break off the attack, run into a nearby service corridor and kill himself, ending the spree. Of course, the lamestream media will not tell you about Nick. They would prefer a higher body count rather than tell you a legally armed citizen saved the day. Here are a few other instances that two minutes of internet research brought to light. In each case, a legally armed private citizen saved lives by being there and by being armed.
1. In Pearl, Mississippi in 1997, 16-year-old Luke Woodham stabbed and bludgeoned to death his mother at home, then killed two students and injured seven at his high school. As he was on his way to another school building , he was stopped by Assistant Principal Joel Myrick, who had gone out to get a handgun from his car. Having that gun was illegal, but it saved lives.
2. In Edinboro, Pennsylvania in 1996, 14-year-old Andrew Wurst shot and killed a teacher at a school dance, and shot and injured several other students. He had just left the dance hall, carrying his gun when he was confronted by the dance hall owner James Strand, who lived next door and kept a shotgun at home.
3. In Winnemucca, Nevada in 2008, Ernesto Villagomez killed two people and wounded two others in a bar filled with three hundred people. He was then shot and killed by a patron who was carrying a gun (and had a concealed carry license).
4. In Colorado Springs in 2007, Matthew Murray killed four people at a church. He was then shot several times by Jeanne Assam, a church member, volunteer security guard, and former police officer (she had been dismissed by a police department 10 years before, and to my knowledge hadn’t worked as a police officer since).
So, I do want some legislative action. I want “gun free zones” abolished, at least for legally armed citizens with government issued licenses to carry. This is real “common sense” gun legislation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)