Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Still have doubts

For example, in the United Kingdom, only military personnel are allowed to have handguns, while in the United States an individual may even own a semiautomatic rifle. Parker says it would be impossible to come up with a universal definition for military arms that would be comprehensive or effective in preventing irresponsible transfers—the ultimate goal of the treaty.

1 comment:

  1. The Supreme Court has ruled, in Reid vs Covert in 1956, that no treaty takes precedence over the Constitution.
    If only we lived in a nation of laws...

    ReplyDelete